Critically, you also need to decouple the implementer from the reviewer. I've learned this the hard way too many times: if the same model instance implements and evaluates its own work, it's biased. It will gloss over issues and tell you all tasks are complete when they aren't. It's not malice, it's the same reason you don't grade your own exam. Have a different model (or a different instance with a review-specific prompt) do the review pass. Your signal quality goes way up.
Дипломаты заявили о скрытом вовлечении альянса в конфликт из-за стратегического решения16:38
，这一点在safew中也有详细论述
源代码泄露、CMS失误与信任危机三月初，关于Mythos的博客草稿被存于未加密可公开搜索的数据存储库——CMS配置错误导致约3000项内部资产暴露，含模型推广战略计划。数日后3月31日，因打包错误，运行npm install安装Claude Code的用户在三小时内可下载Anthropic完整源代码（51.2万行），该事件在开发社区引发广泛关注并由VentureBeat首发报道。
· 两者皆破 → 先被攻破方胜；若无法确定时序，赌局作废无捐赠
Semantic Scholar